Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bhalla, Tamanna
- Efficacy of GOD H007 Formulation on Weeds in Grasslands of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :65 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 95-99Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2019 at the Research Farm of Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, to study the efficacy of new herbicide combination product GOD H007 (containing glyphosate 40% and pyrithiobac sodium 3%) for managing weeds in grasslands. The experiment was laid out in Randomised Block Design with three replications, and consisted of seven weed control treatments viz., GOD H007 at 860, 882 and 903 g/ha, pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g/ha, glyphosate 820 g/ha, hand weeding and a weedy check. Application of this new herbicide combination product GOD H007 903 g/ha though remaining statistically alike with glyphosate 820 g/ha, resulted in significantly lowest total weed density and total weed dry matter at all the stages of observation except that at 30 days after spray (DAS) at which hand weeding proved to be a superior treatment. These three treatments also recorded higher weed control efficiency. However, significantly highest fresh and dry herbage yield at 60 DAS was recorded with the application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g/ha. Application of this new herbicide GOD H007 903 g/ha showed promise to be effective for managing weeds in grassland.Keywords
GOD H007,, Weed Control, Grass Land, Glyphosate, Pyrithiobac Sodium.References
- Angiras NN. 2014. Management of perennial weeds under noncrop land hill ecosystems. Indian Journal of Weed Science 46 (1):52-60.
- Corbett J, Askew S, Thomas W and Wilcut J. (2004). Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac and sulfosate. Weed Technology 18 (2):443-453.
- Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research 2nd edn Wiley Inter Science, New York, USA P 680.
- Mishra A and Tosh GC. 1979. Chemical weed control studies of dwarf wheat. Journal of Research (Orissa University of Agricultural Science and Technology) 10: 1-6.
- Bio-Efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL on Weed Flora of Tea and its Effect on Soil Microbial Activities
Abstract Views :78 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 235-238Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the farmers’ field in Panchrukhi block of Kangra District (H.P.) during kharif 2019 to evaluate the bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity of glyphosate 41% SL in tea (Camellia sinensis). The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with ten treatments and was replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of six doses of a new formulation of glyphosate 41 % SL (All Clear, Anu Products Ltd.) 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 8.0 litre / ha, glyphosate 41 % SL (Roundup, Monsanto), glyphosate 71 % SG 3.0 kg / ha and weedy and weed free checks. Major weeds that were found to infest the experimental tea orchard included Erigeron canadensis, Ageratum conyzoides, Cynodon dactylon, Imperata cylindrica, Paspalum conjugatum and Polygonum alatum. The results revealed that in tea crop weeds can be effectively controlled with the application of glyphosate 41% SL (All Clear) 3.0 litre/ha and 4.0 litre/ha. No phytotoxicity symptoms on tea were observed at any of dose of herbicide.Keywords
Bio-Efficacy, Glyphosate, Tea, All Clear, Weeds.References
- Bose A, Kumar R and Roy SB 2007. Integrated weed management to control Heridium spp and Polygonum chinensis in young tea plantations of India. In: Proc. 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, pp 565-567, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
- Devi NM., Kundu CK., Bera PS., Panda S and Das S. 2019. Evaluation of glyphosate 41% SL to control weeds in tea at Terai region of West Bengal. Journal of Crop and Weed 15: 213-219.
- Ilango RVJ, Durairaj J and Mohan KP 2010. Evaluation of Excel-mera 71 for control of Commelina species. Newsletter-UPASI Tea Research Foundation 20:20-25.
- Kumar A and Ghosh RK 2015.Bio efficacy of glyphosate for management of weeds in tea. In: 25th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference on Weed Science for Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Biodiversity, pp377, Hyderabad , India
- Mani VS, Malla ML, Gautam KC and Bhagwndas. 1973. Weed killing chemicals inpotato cultivation. Indian Farming 22:17-18.
- Opeke KL. 2005.Tropical commodity tree crops. 2nd Ed., Spectrum House, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 436-440.
- Wollum AG 1983. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. In: Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties), ed Page AL. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc. pp 781-802 (DOI:10.2134/agronmonogr 9.2.2ed).
- Evaluation of herbicides to control alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :161 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 205-209Abstract
An open pot experiment was conducted during Kharif 2020 and 2021 at Research Farm of Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, H.P. to evaluate herbicides for the control of Alternanthera philoxeroides. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with three replications and consisted of ten herbicide treatments viz. glyphosate 1000 g/ha, paraquat 1000 g/ha, 2,4-D Na salt 1250 g/ha, 2,4-D ethyl ester 1000 g/ha, metsulfuron methyl 4 g/ha, carfentrazone 25 g/ha, glufosinate ammonium 500 g/ha, bispyribac Na 20 g/ha, flumioxazin 200 g/ha, diuron 500 g/ha and one weedy check (control). All the herbicide treatments resulted in significantly better control of Alternanthera compared to control (weedy check). Glyphosate 1000 g/ha remaining at par with metsulfuron methyl 4 g/ha provided lowest shoot count at all stages of observation during both years. This was followed by application of 2,4 D ethyl ester 1000 g/ha and carfentrazone 25 g/ha which except for initial stage of observation gave results statistically similar to glyphosate 1000 g/ha and metsulfuron methyl 4 g/ha from 25 to 55 days after 2 spray. The lowest weed dry matter (g/m ) and therefore highest weed control efficiency was recorded with application of glyphosate 1000 g/ha, metsulfuron methyl 4 g/ha and 2,4 D ethyl ester 1000 g/ha at 55 days after spray.Keywords
Alligator weed, herbicides, pot studies.References
- Alfas MOK, Zaroug MSAand Elkhawad M. 2021. Efficacy and selectivity of pendimethalin, diuron and their mixtures for weed control in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), Gezira State, Sudan. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research 5(3): 59-64.
- Chauhan BS and Abugho SB. 2012. Effect of growth stage on the efficacy of Postemergence herbicides on four weed species of direct-seeded rice. Scientific World Journal 2012 (https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/123071).
- Chauhan G, Kumar S, Rana SS and Manuja S. 2022. Weed management indices as affected by different weed control treatments in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (1):104-106.
- EPPO (European Plant Protection Organisation). 2016. Data sheets on pests recommended for regulation - Alternanthera philoxeroides (Amaranthaceae). EPPO Bulletin 46 (1): 8-13.
- Guo Land Wang T. 2009. Impact of invasion of exotic plant Alternanthera philoxeroides on interspecies association and stability of native plant community. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 17: 851–856.
- Kelly ST, Shankle MW and Miller DK. 2006. Efficacy and tolerance of flumioxazin on sweet potato (Ipomea batata) Weed Technology 20: 334-339.
- Langeland KA. 1986. Evaluation of herbicides for the control of rooted alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Proceedings of Southern Weed Science Conference 39: 384.
- Mack RN. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10 (3): 689-710.
- Martin J and Gaudard L. 1997. Paraquat, diuron and atrazine for the renewal of chemical weed control in northern Cameroon. Agriculture et developpementSpecial issue 29-41.
- Mishra A and Tosh GC. 1979. Chemical weed control studies of dwarf wheat. Journal of Research (Orissa University of Agricultural Science and Technology) 10: 1-6.
- Pradhan A and Sushilkumar. 2019. Aquatic weeds management through chemical and manual integration to reduce cost by manual removal alone and its effect on water quality. Indian Journal of Weed Science 51(2): 183–187.
- Richardson RJ, Roten RL, West AM, True SL and Gardner AP. 2008. Response of selected aquatic invasive weeds to flumioxazin and carfentrazone– ethyl. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 46: 154–158.
- Sainty G, McCorkelle G and Julien M. 1998. Control and spread of alligator weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb, in Australia: lessons for other regions. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5:195–201.
- Spencer NR and Coulson JR. 1976. The biological control of alligator weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides, in the United States of America. Aquatic Botany 2:177-190.
- Sushilkumar, Shobha S and Vishwakarma K. 2008. Evaluation of herbicide persistence in sediment to control alligator weed. Indian Journal of Weed Science 40 (1&2): 46-49.
- Williams JA and West CJ. 2000. Environmental weeds in Australia and New Zealand: issues and approaches to management. Austral Ecology 25: 425- 444